The Oregon Faith Report - Faith News from Oregon

Resolving the most difficult conflicts

February 16, 2010

Georgene Rice of KPDQ-FM interviews Ken Newberger, author of Hope in the Face of Conflict.

Conflict surrounds all of us, whether it is in marriage, religious factions, in our churches, our workplace, or between countries. But, it can be avoided, according to Conflict Resolution Specialist Dr. Ken Newberger. The author of Hope in the Face of Conflict offers practical advice to foster reconciliation.

GEORGENE: Dr. Newberger, how do we make peace with one another and live together once conflict has occurred?  In the world today, we are surrounded by conflict. We are either the object of it or often times the cause of conflict.

NEWBERGER: It is all around us, but if we don’t deal with it, it just gets worse.  You must be conflict competent. By that I mean having the tools to deal with conflict so that it can be dealt with constructively. We must address it, resolve it, then get past it.

You make the point that love, not justice, is the first foundation to peace making. I think a lot of us would think it would be the other way around.

NEWBERGER: You need justice, but justice alone does not bring reconciliation. You could have justice by throwing someone in jail but there is not reconciliation—no relationship repair. If someone steals something out of your home, you are going to want those items returned and want that person punished. But, through reconciliation there must be an orientation towards love once those problems are addressed and resolved.

GEORGENE: You also talk about third party peacemaking being a major characteristic of the model.

NEWBERGER: If you are in conflict with someone and it’s not getting resolved, you need to bring in a third party.  It must be someone you both trust. It may be someone in the family or someone with whom you’ve had a good relationship. This includes churches. Most churches don’t have a plan to resolve conflict. They must design a plan in advance that includes a mediator.

If you are convinced it was someone else’s fault, that they are responsible, is there a role for the offended party to engage if the apology from the offending party is not forthcoming?

NEWBERGER: It is up to the offended party to initiate the process and involve a mediator. It is then up to the offender to say they want to be a part of the process and want to get the matter resolved. If they do that, there is a good chance things will work out.

GEORGENE: In your book you outline 12 stages for the Judeo-Christian model for peacemaking, walk us quickly through those 12 steps to reconciling with one another.

NEWBERGER: The book is over 400 pages, so I’ll just touch on the concepts. Initially, the parties would simply start the process. Then they would immerse themselves into the situation and determine how they see justice and envision peace. When people are in conflict they reduce each other to their worst fault, so they must create a human image of how God created that person–that they are far greater than the sin of their way. Then each person needs to see the error of their way and make a genuine apology. Reparations and forgiveness must be granted. At that point there may be a spirit of reconciliation to connect, but there could be some outstanding issues that need to be resolved so their relationship can be made whole. Finally, there may be some follow-up and the mediator helps them work through those issues.

GEORGENE: I loved your reference to how God reconciled with us, how He made peace with us, because He was the offended party. Often times we think that if we are the offended party, we are going to sit and wait until the offender approaches us.

NEWBERGER: If that was the way God had dealt with us, we would be sitting on our sins for eternity.

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Renovator February 16, 2010

“Judeo-Christian” {nnn}?!?

Dictionaries define “Judeo” as a combinative form. Thus, the compound word “Judeo-Christian” implies that Judaism (Torah) is no more than a dependent element of Christianity.

In typical supersessionist and displacement Christian tradition (see Oxford historian James Parkes, The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue as well as the History Museum pages of, Christians thoughtlessly presume the prefix “Judeo-” to subsume and lay false claim to Judaism (Torah) by means of an impossible union of “Judeo-” (pro-Torah) with “Christian” (supersessionist and displacement antinomian=anti-Torah=misojudaism). Thus, the phrase “Judeo-Christian” implies supersession and displacement by Christianity, relegating Judaism to an ancient, no longer existent, historical people replaced in the distant past by Christians. This is no less misojudaic (hatred of Judaism) and repugnant than labeling the Tanakh (the original, Jewish, Bible) the “Old Testament.”

Where values are shared, the accurate (and honest) way would be to state “Judaic and Christian…” (values, traditions, etc.) instead of “Judeo-Christian.”

Now that you know an accurate and acceptable alternative there is no reasonable justification to insist on continuing to use misojudaic terminology.

It’s reasonably clear to most that the founders of America were primarily Christians. Be content with that and stifle your greed to lay false claim to Judaism along with it. The history of the original Christian church of 135 C.E. was indisputably antinomian, and even viciously misojudaic (see Oxford historian James Parkes, The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue). The 10 Commandments are an indivisible whole. Rejecting any one constitutes rejecting of the whole… and the Church rejected the 10 Commandments when it superseded and displaced #4 (and shredded #1-3 as well). Examples are endless. Dt. 13.1-6 explicitly precludes the Christian NT exactly as it does the Quran, Book of Mormon, Watchtower, etc. Consequently, claiming your “New Testament” is included in a “Judeo-Christian Bible” is no less wrong and offensive. The “New Testament” is NOT part of the original Bible.

Greed to claim supersession over, and displacement of, Judaism introduces self-contradictions that undermine and negate your arguments.

Christians’ religious greed results in fecklessness that enables the postmodernists to disassemble and destroy America.

Contrary to many modern Christian overstatements, the founders of America guaranteed that religion be free to all in private and imposed on no one in public.

Unfortunately, America’s freedom to practice one’s religion in private doesn’t satisfy religious greed–particularly that of Christians–toward dominance. In such case, religions in America need to be declawed. By over-reaching you ensure the opposite–and probably disproportionate–reaction.

earnest February 16, 2010

Someone call a mediator! Renovator has a conflict that needs to be resolved.

Dr. Ken Newberger February 16, 2010

In my book, “Hope in the Face of Conflict,” I have a brief glossary of terms in which I define my use of the term “Judeo-Christian.” It is reproduced below.

“Judeo-Christian means ‘being historically related to both Judaism and Christianity'(Princeton University). The New Testament could not have been written as it is apart from the existence of the Old Testament. Christianity could have not come into being apart from the existence of the Jewish nation of Israel. Although there are differences between Judaism and Christianity, the term Judeo-Christian positively speaks of the shared understanding that the God of the universe and the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are one and the same. This mutual understanding is based on the shared foundational belief that the Old Testament is the divinely inspired Word of God.”

I might add that many Jewish leaders positively use the term, including author and radio host, Dennis Prager, U.S. Representative from Virginia, Eric Cantor, and former N.Y. State Supreme Court Associate Justice, Joseph M. Proskauer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *


Subscribe to Weekly Updates

Oregon Religion News Ticker

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2018, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Faith Report through weekly email updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

RSS Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)