March 12, 2010
Court says “Under God” not a prayer
Faith Report News Note:
The most unpredictable court in America, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has made an interesting ruling on whether the words “Under God” in the Pledge of allegiance is a religious prayer or a citizen declaration. Their decision surprised many as reported in the San Fransisco Chronicle.
The federal court that touched off a furor in 2002 by declaring the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance to be an unconstitutional endorsement of religion took another look at the issue Thursday and said the phrase invokes patriotism, not religious faith. The daily schoolroom ritual is not a prayer, but instead “a recognition of our founders’ political philosophy that a power greater than the government gives the people their inalienable rights,” said the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco in a 2-1 ruling. “Thus, the pledge is an endorsement of our form of government, not of religion or any particular sect.”
The dissenting judge, Stephen Reinhardt, said statements by members of Congress who added “under God” to the pledge in 1954 show conclusively that it was intended to “indoctrinate our nation’s children with a state-held religious belief.”
Print This Post
Email This Post
Discuss this article
April 17, 2010
This is a sad day for religious equality in our counrty. As is apparent by Ally’s comment to this story, the people of this counrty see the words “under god” as a religious statemant. It needs to be removed. Pride in your country has nothing to do with religion.
Wow! For the 9th court to come up with this ruling is amazing. God does indeed “move in mysterious ways.”