The Oregon Faith Report - Faith News from Oregon

State faults Gresham Bakery in same-sex wedding cake case

January 22, 2014

courtOregon Faith News Note: Last year a Gresham bakery business, Sweet Cakes owned by Aaron & Melissa Klein,  was approached with a customer who requested a cake to be made for their same sex wedding.   The owners refused and the issue was brought before the Bureau of Labor and Industries as a discrimination case.   Below are quotes on the latest developments on the Gresham Bakery same-sex discrimination cake case.

From KATU-2 & KBOI Salem,
  The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries said Friday that the Gresham bakery, Sweet Cakes by Melissa, violated the civil rights of a same-sex couple when it denied service to them.The state labor department said it found during its investigation “substantial evidence of unlawful discrimination” when the bakery refused to bake a wedding cake for the couple.The department said private businesses are not allowed to discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation.

From BOLI statement
“Under Oregon law, Oregonians may not be denied service based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The law provides an exemption for religious organizations and schools,but does not allow private business owners to discriminate based on sexual orientation, just as they cannot legally deny service based on race, sex, age, disability or religion. The investigation concludes that the bakery is not a religious institution under law and that the business’ policy of refusing to make same-sex wedding cakes represents unlawful discrimination based on sexual Orientation.”

Statement by Sweet Cakes bakery to KGW-TV
“At this point in time all we have to say is we expected this outcome as Brad Avakian made it clear with his statements at the beginning of this investigation. We plan to fight this and we maintain that the constitution protects our religious rights. And we are well within our rights to decline to be involved with a ceremony that goes against our religious beliefs.”

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Bob Clark January 22, 2014

Boy, this is one of those cases in which the referee should just call it as “Play on.” Meaning it is legally wrong for the bakery to deny service, but then again the bakery is kind of akin to an artist; and artists have certain artistic liberties such they could feel like making a masterpiece or a ho-hum lackluster cake.
In such artistic services as this, the government is better off staying out of the dispute as to pursue it to its logical conclusion the artist can argue he could not make a good quality cake because his motivation in this particular case was low. So, is the government going to get into cake judging contests? No, it shouldn’t.

Latter Day Saint January 22, 2014

It’s pretty simple, don’t like liquor, don’t drink liquor, don’t like weed, don’t smoke weed, don’t like porn, don’t watch porn, don’t want an abortion, don’t get an abortion, don’t want gay marriage, marry a person of the opposite sex, want people to respect your rights, respect other peoples rights… ’nuff said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *


Subscribe to Weekly Updates

Oregon Religion News Ticker

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2018, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Faith Report through weekly email updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

RSS Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)