June 29, 2010
June 29, 2010
Oregon Faith Report Reader Survey,
Just in time for the Elena Kagan Supreme Court nominee hearings. Recently we surveyed our readers this question: “Do you feel a Supreme Court nominee’s religion should be a part of the public discussion?”. The majority, 56%, said religion should not be part of the public debate and 44% said yes.
Below are people polled responses on the Elena Kagen question…
- I’m more interested in a candidates moral character than his “religion”.
- It is important to understand every aspect of a nominee’s decision making process
- I would like to know where they are coming from and what they believe.
- Okay if it is, just doesn’ t really matter. It is the principles they act on in their faith that matter, and that is what needs to be scrutinized
- A Supreme Court nominee like Elena Kagan or Sam Alito for that matter, should be free to express their history and life-story in regards to beliefs but not be compelled. There is a vast difference.
- Whatever Kagan says will be used against her anyways.
Copyright © 2013, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report
Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Faith Report through weekly email updates:
Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.
Unfortunately the courts and public discussion has made it pertinent. They can’t seem to leave our school kids alone when they want to say a prayer before they play a game, reference God as their greatest inspiration at a Valedictorian speech, not allow the Pledge said because of the refernce to God, etc. etc. etc. Under those circumstances, you bet I want to know if I have an atheist or a believer making constitutional judicial decisions on religion.