The Oregon Faith Report - Faith News from Oregon

Oregon seminary wrestles with clergy abuse

August 21, 2012

Oregon Faith News Note:

In light of the recent Woodburn priest abuse case, The Oregonian’s Nancy Haught went to Oregon’s top seminary to inquire on how a priest training school tries to prevent and weed out problem priests. The Oregonian interviewed Mount Angel Seminary which trains most of the 150 priests (including retired) in Western Oregon. As with any training school it is not easy to identify hidden psychological problems within a large population. This is why Mount Angel has been adopting stricter standards over time and adapting them. Here is a piece of the article.

When Perez entered Mount Angel Seminary in 1996, a screening process was in place. But it was not as rigorous as it has become in the years since he was ordained in 2002.The Rev. Patrick Brennan, pastor of St. Mary’s Cathedral and president-rector of the seminary from 1990 to 2000, says that as early as the mid-1980s, seminary administrators had explored ways to screen applicants and monitor students, looking for signs of unhealthy or harmful sexual attitudes or behavior.In the 1990s, the seminary required that the organization recommending an applicant to the seminary — either a diocese or a religious community — order a psychological evaluation of the candidate.

The sponsor was required to submit the evaluation along with an applicant’s autobiographical essay, letters of recommendation, transcripts and other documents. The psychological test most often used asked a candidate to respond “true” or “false” to more than 500 statements such as, “I like children,” “People often disappoint me” and “I am easily embarrassed.”

A seminary admissions committee read the application and made a decision. Brennan said he made it a point to read the psychological evaluations himself.

“If there was any indication that something was inappropriate, that person was not admitted,” he said.

But Monsignor Richard Paperini, who became president-rector of the seminary in 2001, wanted to do more. At a time when priest abuse was beginning to gain national publicity, Paperini asked diocese and religious orders to pay for an additional type of psychological test beyond the one instituted by Brennan. Paperini recommended tests that posed open-ended questions.

Read full article here

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

john September 2, 2012

What a joke. Paperini knew about him and others but chose to be politically correct and pro homosexual instead of doing his job and throwing out the bad apples. He was more interested in enrollment and cash flow than justice and truth and souls. This is why so many good men left under his watch including me

c. March 1, 2013

If you knew Paperini knew, why did you not do something?
Not taking action once known, you are also responsible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *


Subscribe to Weekly Updates

Oregon Religion News Ticker

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2018, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Faith Report through weekly email updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

RSS Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)